Win more cases with AI that proves its reasoning.
An explainable AI platform that analyzes legal datasets, identifies winning patterns, and delivers case-by-case strategy — with full audit trails your court would accept.
See the platform in action
Walk through a working demo — sign-in, onboarding, and the five-tab case dashboard: outcome forecast, case plan, precedents, venue, and budget. Clickable end to end on illustrative data, with the auditable trail GoPX produces on every decision.
Open the interactive prototype
What we hear from managing partners and in-house counsel.
-
“We can't deploy AI we can't audit in court.”
— In-house counsel · regulated industry -
“Per-attorney AI tax doesn't match how matters are priced.”
— Litigation firm · managing partner -
“Off-the-shelf chatbots don't know our precedents — and won't cite them.”
— Litigation firm · partner
Three steps from your case file to a defensible strategy.
Built from the GoPX legal AI methodology, not a chatbot wrapper.
- 01
Data Ingestion
Your contracts, depositions, evidence files, and precedents are lifted into structured logic — facts, rules, relationships your team can read and edit. Not embeddings, not a black-box index.
- 02
Pattern Analysis
Cluster historical case outcomes against the active matter. Surface what's worked in comparable fact patterns, who's argued what, and which precedent the opposing side will lean on.
- 03
Case Strategy
Receive a case-by-case strategy with cited precedents, flagged vulnerabilities, and a full audit trail mapping every recommendation to source evidence — defensible in deposition, defensible in court.
One question. A defensible answer.
A litigator asks GoPX whether the active matter can be filed under the new evidentiary standard. GoPX returns a decision and the exact precedents, rules, and reasoning used to reach it.
- Input
Can we file under the new evidentiary standard for digital records?
- Decision
Yes — with two prep steps. File under FRE 902(13)/(14) self-authentication; obtain certifications under §902(13) for the cloud-storage records before filing.
- Precedents cited
Lorraine v. Markel (D. Md. 2007) on digital evidence authentication; advisory committee notes for FRE 902(13)/(14); recent circuit-court applications since 2024.
- Vulnerabilities flagged
Three exhibits lack chain-of-custody documentation. Generate the §902(11) certification before submission. Opposing counsel will likely contest authenticity under FRE 901(b)(9) — preempt with the §902 path.
Three legal-AI categories. Different jobs, different gaps.
The legal-AI market has converged on three product categories. Each solves a different job; GoPX is focused on the gap they leave for defensible strategy and auditable reasoning.
| Category | Examples | Solves | Where it stops |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tier 1 · Research and drafting | Harvey, CoCounsel | Long-form research, document drafting, summarization | Accelerates output, but the reasoning still has to be reconstructed and reviewed. |
| Tier 2 · Drafting and review | Casetext, Callidus | Brief drafting, contract review, document analysis | Speeds up review, but does not create a reusable rule trail for future matters. |
| Tier 3 · Litigation analytics | Lex Machina, Fastcase | Judge analytics, opposing counsel patterns, motion outcomes | Shows historical patterns, but does not turn the active file into a cited strategy. |
| GoPX · Explainable litigation strategy | GoPX Legal AI | Case-by-case strategy with cited precedents, flagged vulnerabilities, full audit trails | — |
Sold on case outcomes, not seat count. Pricing scoped per engagement once the first paid pilot closes.
What the EU AI Act requires of legal-technology buyers.
EU AI Act high-risk provisions take effect August 2, 2026. Penalties reach 7% of global turnover. Legal teams are already the ones evaluating Act compliance internally — GoPX maps directly to the articles you're being asked to defend.
- Article 9
Risk management system across the AI lifecycle.
Structured logic layer makes risk-relevant rules inspectable, versioned, and auditable end-to-end. No black-box weights to risk-assess.
- Article 11
Technical documentation of the system.
Every decision ships with cited rules and source evidence. The audit trail IS the documentation — generated by use, not maintained as a separate artifact.
- Article 13
Transparency to deployers.
Reasoning surfaces are first-class outputs, not debug logs. Operators see what fired and why on every decision, in plain language.
- Article 14
Human oversight measures.
Constraints, exceptions, and escalation paths live as logic — humans edit them in plain English. Override surfaces are part of the product, not a hidden API.
- Article 15
Accuracy, robustness, cybersecurity.
Peer-reviewed: 85% reduction in hallucination and toxicity. Hard-constraint satisfaction at 100% across 180 production queries on the deployed reference stack.
GoPX is in early-stage discussions with international litigation partners and scoping our first paid pilots over the next 60–90 days. We're open to custom pilot engagements with firms ready to test explainable AI on their own case files.
Inquire about a pilotBuild AI decisions that can survive review.
A 45-minute session. We run your contracts, policies, or regulations through GoPX live and return structured logic, a decision walkthrough, and an honest read on fit. No pitch deck.
- Run on your documents, not a generic demo
- Structured logic + decision walkthrough
- Honest read on fit — no pitch deck